Best Website Security Scanners in 2026: Troja vs OWASP ZAP vs Snyk vs Burp Suite
A practical comparison of four very different tools — Troja, OWASP ZAP, Snyk, and Burp Suite — what each is actually for, and how to pick the right one for your stack.
Four tools, four different jobs
"Best security scanner" is the wrong question — these tools do genuinely different things. Snyk scans your dependencies and code. Burp is a manual pentester's toolkit. ZAP is an open-source dynamic scanner. Troja is a fast, fix-oriented scanner built for developers shipping with AI tools. Here's how they actually compare, with no pretense that one replaces all the others.
The quick verdict
| Troja | OWASP ZAP | Snyk | Burp Suite | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Type | DAST + SEO/AEO + BaaS | DAST | SAST/SCA | DAST (manual) |
| Best for | Indie/SaaS devs, AI-built apps | Open-source DAST | Dependencies & code | Pro pentesters |
| Setup | URL, no install | Moderate | CI integration | Steep |
| BaaS (Supabase/Firebase) checks | Yes | No | No | Manual |
| AI fix prompts | Yes | No | Partial | No |
| Cost | Free scan, paid plans | Free | Free tier + paid | Free + paid Pro |
| Learning curve | Minimal | Medium | Low | High |
OWASP ZAP
The open-source Zed Attack Proxy is a respected DAST tool. It proxies traffic, spiders your site, and runs active/passive scans for injection, XSS, and misconfigurations.
- Strengths: free, powerful, scriptable, automatable in CI, no usage limits.
- Weaknesses: real setup and tuning required; noisy results need triage; no dependency or BaaS coverage; you interpret findings yourself.
- Use it if: you want a free, self-hosted dynamic scanner and have the time to configure it.
Snyk
Snyk is fundamentally different — it's SAST + SCA, not a black-box web scanner. It reads your code and dependency manifests to find vulnerable packages, insecure code patterns, container issues, and IaC misconfigs.
- Strengths: excellent dependency/CVE coverage, deep IDE and CI integration, fix PRs for vulnerable packages.
- Weaknesses: needs source/repo access; doesn't probe your running site the way an attacker does; won't catch a misconfigured RLS policy on your live database.
- Use it if: your priority is supply-chain and dependency risk inside the codebase.
Burp Suite
The professional pentester's standard. Burp is an intercepting proxy plus a deep toolkit (Repeater, Intruder, Scanner in Pro) for manual security testing.
- Strengths: unmatched depth and control for skilled testers; finds complex logic and chained vulnerabilities automated tools miss.
- Weaknesses: steep learning curve; largely manual; overkill for a solo dev who just wants to know if their app is safe to launch.
- Use it if: you're a security professional doing hands-on testing.
Troja
Troja is built for the developer who ships with Cursor, Claude, or Windsurf and wants a fast, actionable answer to "is my app safe and visible?"
- Strengths: point it at a URL — no install; 120+ security checks including BaaS misconfigurations (Supabase RLS, Firebase rules) that the others skip; every finding ships a paste-ready AI fix prompt; plus SEO (68 checks) and AEO (46 checks) in the same pass; MCP server so your AI agent can scan and fix in a loop.
- Weaknesses: it's a focused scanner, not a manual pentest framework like Burp, and not a code-level SCA like Snyk.
- Use it if: you want fast, prioritized, fix-first results for a modern (often AI-built) web app — and you care about whether AI engines can see you, not just whether attackers can.
How to choose
- Solo dev / indie SaaS shipping fast: Troja for the live-app + BaaS + fix-prompt workflow; add Snyk in CI for dependencies.
- Open-source-only budget: ZAP for DAST plus
npm auditfor dependencies. - Security professional: Burp for manual testing, Snyk for SCA.
- Enterprise: realistically a combination — SCA in CI, DAST in staging, periodic manual pentests.
A pragmatic split many teams land on is one scanner per layer, wired into CI so nothing is manual:
# .github/workflows/security.yml — one tool per layer
jobs:
deps:
steps:
- run: npx snyk test --severity-threshold=high # supply chain
liveapp:
steps:
- run: npx troja scan https://staging.example # outside-in + BaaS + headers
Snyk reads the code; Troja attacks the running app and checks your Supabase/Firebase rules — together they cover the two layers a single tool can't.
These aren't mutually exclusive. The honest answer for most shipping developers is Troja for the fast outside-in pass and a dependency scanner in CI — and Burp only when you bring in a professional.
Scan it with Troja
If you want to see what the outside-in, fix-first approach catches on your app — including the Supabase and Firebase misconfigs the other tools don't check — run a free Troja scan and get your threat count in about 30 seconds.
Run the scan this post is about.
Free, no signup. See what's hiding inside your walls in ~30 seconds.
Keep reading
All postsTroja vs. checkvibe: the closest scanner comparison (2026)
checkvibe pioneered security + SEO + AEO scanning with AI fix prompts and a 7-engine matrix. Troja matches it and adds connected deep-stack scans. The honest comparison.
ReadTroja vs. Fixnx: which AI website scanner should you use?
Fixnx runs 100+ AI-powered security, SEO and speed checks with credit-pack pricing. Troja adds AEO, connected deep-stack scans and per-finding AI fixes. Compared.
ReadTroja vs. CyScan.io: recon tool vs. fix-it scanner
CyScan.io is a free attack-surface recon scanner — endpoints, subdomains, fuzzing, screenshots. Troja is a fix-and-ship scanner with AI fixes, AEO and deep-stack scans.
Read